Kristen Seabury vs Nil Farah Fahrol Rodzi Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Seabury 1 - 0 Rodzi

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seabury has won 14.04% of points on their second serve, while Rodzi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seabury, in recent form, has won 31.82% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rodzi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 17.86% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Seabury has saved 32.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rodzi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Seabury has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 8), with Rodzi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Seabury has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 6% (W/L 1/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Rodzi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
• Player level: In the last year, Seabury has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 5), where as Rodzi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seabury winning 1 times and Rodzi being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seabury winning 2 and Rodzi winning 0. The last match between Seabury and Rodzi was at the W15 Kuala Lumpur, 20-02-2023, Q2 round, Hard with Kristen Seabury getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Seabury and Rodzi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seabury winning 0 times and Rodzi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seabury winning 0, and Rodzi 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seabury has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Rodzi has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seabury has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rodzi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Seabury has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rodzi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)